Power tools have largely taken over from hand tools all around the world, because they allow individuals to get more work done in an alloted space of time. Power tools work far more quickly than hand tools and without the operative having to expend a lot of energy having to turn a handle or push a saw.
However, the increased productivity that power tools deliver comes at a cost: 1] you have to pay for the electricity that drives the apparatus and 2] there is an increased risk to the operative’s health and safety. The cost of the electricity ought to be more than easily covered by the increased productivity, but health and safety is frequently disregarded until it is too late.
People seem to not comprehend the potential dangers of an inexpert person using a power tool. For example, a slip with a hand saw, normally means an ugly joint, but a slip with a power saw can cost a finger; a miss whilst hammering a nail home can cost a bruised finger or an ugly dent, but a slip with a nail gun can be like having a bullet in the leg.
This is the reason why insurance companies have made it imperative for companies employing trades people to send their workers on health and safety courses. Claims from inexpert workers was getting ridiculous as inexpert trades people abandonned their old hand tool in favour of the powered option.
It caused a great deal of controversy in the Eighties and Nineties in the building industry among employers and employees alike to have to send people on courses about how to use power tools. In Britain, employers were not allowed to let a carpenter use a rotary saw, for instance, unless he or she could prove that they had been trained to use one. Most individuals thought that the health and safety lot had gone too far.
But there were not so many accidents; less time off work due to injury and fewer claims against the insurance firms.
There was tremendous opposition in our building firm from the workforce, when we declared that nobody could sign out a power tool unless he/she had a valid safety certificate to confirm training in the use of that particular piece of apparatus.
We also had a joinery shop, where traditionally each carpenter could go to create anything he needed. Then this policy came in and only one carpenter out of forty was permitted to use the power tools. All of a sudden there was a rush to get safety certificates. The new laws had hurt people’s pride.
They felt that they were being told that they did not know their trade, but when they were disqualified from using power tools, they were made to look like inexperienced apprentices again. So there was a rush to acquire a certificate and power tool companies would send a safety specialist to the workshop to train all the relevant tradesmen in the use of their power tools free of charge and hand out certificates.
Then our firm decided to get their ISO 9000 certificate and power tools had to be given certificates of inspection too. So now we had to employ someone to look after the power tools.
Only tradesmen with certificates of competence could sign out a power tool and a power tool could only be signed out if it had a certificate to prove that it had been passed ’safe for use’ within the last two months. All power tools had to have a certificate of reliability attached to it, a set of safety rules and a pair of safety spectacles. That covered the firm from accusations of negligence.
That was 15-20 years ago in the building industry in the UK. I am not relating all this as a history lesson, but more to point out that individuals can go to a shop and buy or hire very hazardous power tools without having to prove competence. Professionals at work have to prove that they and the tools are up to the job, but the public does not.
I am not in favour of another layer of bureaucracy, but I do would like to make people aware of the danger of not knowing how to use power tools correctly and without even the most basic safety apparatus.
Never use power tools without safety glasses is the first rule. Protect your eyes from splinters and flying debris at all costs. A professional would, so so should you.
Owen Jones, the writer of this article, writes on several subjects, yet is now involved with Uvex Safety Glasses. If you would like to know more, go to our website at Safety Glasses Bifocal